Youth involvement in the workforce and broader economic activity has been an ever-present topic of national conversation across the UK during 2026, with over one million 16-24 year olds not in education, employment or training. This statistic has been widely highlighted by the Milburn Review, with a range of interventions aiming to tackle the challenge now in place and more expected over the coming months. Yet while the scale of the issue is national, the challenge is not being experienced equally across the country.
Data suggests that some places are seeing much sharper increases in youth unemployment, claimant counts and inactivity than others, while a smaller number have managed to buck wider trends. Differences in rates across different parts of the country raise questions around what factors contribute to changes, and they demonstrate the importance of local insight and reliable data to shape effective policy responses.
At GC Insight, we work with local areas to support the development of skills and employment plans through data collation, evidence gathering and consultation, including as part of initiatives such as Get Britain Working. In this article, we explore the latest data on youth unemployment and economic inactivity across the UK, examining what it reveals about current trends and why understanding local differences will be crucial to designing effective responses.
The latest data from the ONS’ Annual Population Survey in the year to March 2026 showed that the unemployment rate for 16-24 year olds in the UK was 13.9%. While this is lower than the peak of youth unemployment in 2011-2012, today’s rate is nearly as high as it was during the pandemic in 2020-2021 (14.0%).

Although local unemployment estimates have wide confidence intervals, particularly for specific age groups, limiting the reliability of comparisons between local areas, the national data provides a clearer picture: youth unemployment has been rising faster than unemployment across the wider working-age population.
Claimant count data, which covers people receiving unemployment-related benefits such as Jobseeker’s Allowance and Universal Credit, shows a mixed picture across the UK. Among 16–24-year-olds, the claimant count increased by 18% between June 2024 and June 2026, but trends varied considerably between areas.

While the majority of areas recorded an increase in claims over the period, 18 areas saw a reduction, including six areas in Scotland and six in Northern Ireland. Westmorland and Furness recorded the largest percentage decrease. This may indicate that more young people entered or re-entered work in these areas, although claimant counts are influenced by eligibility and take-up as well as labour market conditions.
Between the years ending March 2024 and March 2026, economic activity rates among the working-age population aged 16–64 changed by less than one percentage point in 40 upper-tier and single-tier local authority areas. Rates decreased by at least one percentage point in 68 areas and increased by at least one percentage point in 98, indicating a broadly stable national picture with a slight overall increase.
Nationally for 16-24 year olds, there has been a 0.1% increase in economic activity since 2024, however, data confidence levels are too low at a sub-regional or local level to provide reliable analysis. At a regional level where confidence levels are stronger, there is significant differentiation visible. Wales and the North East of England have seen decreases in economic activity among 16-24 year olds by over 4% in the last two years, while the East Midlands saw a 3.4% reduction. In contrast London and the East of England saw the greatest increases at over 3% each, although London has by far the lowest economic activity rates among this age group at just 51.7%.

While limited localised data makes drawing conclusions difficult, the clearer picture at the regional level suggests the youth inactivity challenge is not the same everywhere and needs targeted local interventions.
The Milburn Review has highlighted system level issues contributing to youth economic inactivity, with suggestions that the current challenges are not just a short-term fluctuation. It can be contributed to by a variety of factors including limited access to opportunities, poor mental and physical health, and disabilities. Additionally, the review highlighted a trend of the labour market becoming more difficult for young people to enter. A variety of reasons can sit behind this, including but not limited to:
A range of other challenges also exist, including the growth in insecure and non-standard employment, cost pressures and uneven social capital. High levels of youth unemployment present challenges for young people both in the present and over the long-term, while they can also have significant impacts on the economy and the stretching of local services.
The data points to a national challenge, but not a uniform one. Youth unemployment, claimant count trends and economic activity rates vary by place, suggesting that local labour market conditions, sector mix, skills provision and other factors all matter. As the policy response develops, local areas will need clear evidence on where young people are disengaged from the labour market, what barriers they face, and which routes into work can be most effective.
At GC Insight, we have been working across a range of labour market studies, including Get Britain Working Plans and labour market monitoring dashboards, helping local areas build a stronger evidence base around participation, inactivity and routes into work. As the policy response develops, local insights will continue to be of increasing importance. To learn more about our work, get in touch with our team.
Published: 07 August 2026 - Author: Nathan Shoesmith